Cover of: The Supreme Court in modern role. | Carl Brent Swisher Read Online
Share

The Supreme Court in modern role. by Carl Brent Swisher

  • 277 Want to read
  • ·
  • 1 Currently reading

Published by New York University Press in [New York] .
Written in English

Subjects:

Places:

  • United States.

Subjects:

  • United States. Supreme Court.,
  • Constitutional law -- United States.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Bibliographical notes: p. 193-206.

SeriesJames Stokes lectureship politics
Classifications
LC ClassificationsKF8748 .S93 1958
The Physical Object
Pagination214 p.
Number of Pages214
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL6244701M
LC Control Number58005041
OCLC/WorldCa418713

Download The Supreme Court in modern role.

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

  The Supreme Court in Modern Role by Carl Brent Swisher, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. The Supreme Court in Modern Role: Carl Brent Swisher: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience.5/5(1). About article usage data: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean euismod bibendum laoreet. Proin gravida dolor sit amet lacus accumsan et viverra justo commodo. COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus. The Supreme Court in modern role. [Carl Brent Swisher] Home. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help. Search. Search for Library Items Search for Lists Search for Contacts Search for a Library. Create Book\/a>, schema:CreativeWork\/a> ; \u00A0\u00A0\u00A0 library.

The Supreme Court in modern role. Format Book Edition Rev. ed. Published [New York] New York University Press, Description ix, p. 22 cm. Uniform series James Stokes lectureship on politics. Notes Includes bibliographies. Subject headings United States. Supreme Court. Constitutional law- . Criticism and hostility may tarnish the reputation of the Court and limit its symbolic authority, even when counterbalanced by praise from admirers of challenged decisions and may cause thoughtful observers to withhold legitimate and badly needed criticism. The purpose of this revised edition is to illuminate for the general reader chosen segments of the Court's performance, and to aid. The role of the US Supreme Court is to interpret and ensure proper application of the laws written by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. However, the powers of the Supreme Court can be summarised in its four roles. Judicial Review. judicial review established through Marbury v. . A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped OurConstitution: Revised Edition by Peter Irons | out of 5 stars

Moreover, many of the Founding Fathers expected the Supreme Court to assume this role in regard to the Constitution; Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, for example, had underlined the importance of judicial review in the Federalist Papers, which urged adoption of the Constitution.   When the Supreme Court's effectively decided the presidential election of , it decision illustrated a classic question in American politics: what is the appropriate role for the Supreme Court? The dilemma is between judicial activism, the Court's willingness to make significant changes in public policy, and judicial restraint, the Court's Cited by: This book spells out, in maddening detail, the darker side of the Supreme Court. It focuses especially on three periods: post-Civil War, in which the Court essentially nullified the war and its constitutional results; the Lochner period, in which the Court handed the country over to Gilded Age big business; and the current period of Hobby Lobby and Citizens United.4/5. The main reason for this flexibility is the interpretation by the US Supreme Court. This book teases out the mechanism of how the Court manages to maintain this flexibility. Bringing together legal scholars from the United States and Europe who focus on different aspects of the Court’s jurisprudence, the work consists of five parts.